Australia faces an escalating cybercrime crisis, leading experts to call for standardised training across all law enforcement agencies. During a Parliamentary Joint Committee hearing, specialists highlighted the urgent need for unified protocols to effectively combat sophisticated cyber threats.
Canberra, Australia — During the third public hearing of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement's inquiry into the capability of law enforcement to respond to cybercrime, experts advocated for standardised training for cybercrime investigators across Australia's law enforcement agencies. This call to action aims to address the nation's growing cybercrime crisis by establishing a unified approach to equipping law enforcement with the necessary skills to combat increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal activities.
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement in Australia is currently conducting an inquiry into the capability of law enforcement to respond to cybercrime, with the third public hearing taking place this week in Canberra. This inquiry, initiated on October 16, 2023, aims to assess and improve the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in tackling the growing threat of cybercrime.
At the recent hearing, experts delivered a stark message: Australia's fragmented approach to cybercrime training is leaving the nation vulnerable. The lack of standardised training across law enforcement agencies creates inconsistencies that cybercriminals are eager to exploit.
Standardised training for investigators is crucial to ensure that all agencies, regardless of size or resources, have the skills and tools to combat complex cyber threats," said Garren Hamilton, Managing Director of Captura Cyber. He emphasised the need for a centralised approach to training, similar to models in the USA, UK, and Canada, which provide all law enforcement personnel—regardless of agency size—access to the same high-level training and resources.
"Cybercriminals operate without borders and adapt rapidly," one expert noted. "Our disjointed training efforts are no match for their coordinated attacks. Without a unified strategy and standardised training, we are essentially fighting a wildfire with a garden hose."
Australia is confronting a dramatic escalation in cybercrime, underscoring an urgent need for standardised cybersecurity protocols both nationally and globally. The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) reported over 94,000 cyber scam incidents to law enforcement this year—an incident every six minutes. The ASD Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 reveals that cybercriminals are relentlessly adapting their tactics to maximize extortion, leading to widespread data breaches that expose millions and significantly escalate the financial toll of cybercrime.
Business leaders are acutely aware of this growing threat. A study by Eftsure involving 500 Australian CFOs found that 50% are more concerned about security heading into 2024 than the previous year, and a staggering 98% believe cybercrime is expanding globally. Finance professionals, in particular, are increasingly targeted by sophisticated phishing scams, amplifying anxiety within organizations.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) echoes these concerns, noting that the risk of extreme losses from cyber incidents is rising sharply. Such losses, which have more than quadrupled since 2017 to $2.5 billion, could jeopardise companies' funding and solvency.
The absence of global cybersecurity standards is a critical vulnerability. Cybercriminals exploit inconsistencies between nations' cyber defences, maneuvering through legal loopholes and jurisdictional boundaries with ease. While Australia's collaboration with its Five Eyes partners—the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand—is a positive step, it falls short without standardized protocols. The Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG) regularly shares intelligence and strategies, but the lack of uniform standards hampers these efforts.
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw emphasized the importance of international cooperation:
"Five Eyes is doing more than just watching. The gains to be won from the new thematic model and CIAG mean we will be able to disrupt earlier and prevent targets from taking a foothold in our countries."
At the recent Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement hearing on May 23, 2024, experts underscored the urgency of the situation. Mr. Corbett-Wilkins, a cybersecurity specialist from Clyde & Co who testified before the committee, highlighted the inherent risks organizations face when dealing with ransomware attacks. He warned:
"There are risks, and we're not even talking about legal risks. We're actually talking about recovery risks here. There are always inherent risks with paying ransom groups. They are known threat actors. There are risks with them splintering and reforming, and you're not actually sure who you're dealing with in the current environment."
This statement illuminates the complexities and uncertainties that companies grapple with when considering ransom payments to cybercriminals. The fluid nature of threat actors—who often splinter and rebrand—makes it nearly impossible to predict outcomes or establish any form of trust.
Further emphasising the scale of the problem, when questioned by Mr. Repacholi about the frequency of ransom payments, Mr. Corbett-Wilkins revealed:
"We surveyed 100 incidents over a 12-month period, and 30 percent paid. So you're looking at about one in three. It's a massive issue." said Corbett-Wilkins
These figures are alarming, indicating that a significant proportion of organizations feel compelled to pay ransoms, potentially fueling further criminal activity due to a lack of effective deterrents and support.
The ongoing inquiry by the Parliamentary Joint Committee presents a pivotal opportunity to address these vulnerabilities. Experts are calling for standardised training across agencies, embedding cybercrime modules in cadet training, and advancing digital forensics capabilities. Implementing these measures is imperative to strengthen our defences and outpace cybercriminal innovations.
Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs triggered Wall Street’s steepest plunge since COVID, erasing $3.1T in market value. Tech giants like Apple and Amazon were hit hardest as global supply chain fears grew. Experts warn of looming stagflation, recession, and economic fallout.
China will require clear labeling of all AI-generated content starting September 1, 2025, marking a strict global standard. Backed by top agencies, the rule targets fraud and misinformation. Firms like Tencent must comply or face penalties, while trust may grow for those who do.
Tesla and SpaceX are pushing back against proposed Trump-era tariffs, warning they raise costs and hurt US manufacturing. Elon Musk argues these policies threaten Tesla’s global edge and risk helping rivals abroad, urging a more balanced approach to protect key industries.
Australia’s 2025 Federal Budget prioritizes short-term voter appeal, neglecting vital structural tax reforms and AI investment. Industry leaders warn Australia risks economic competitiveness as global peers accelerate, highlighting critical gaps in tech, energy, and strategic vision.
