CrowdStrike's disastrous July 19 software update crippled Jetstar and exposed vulnerabilities, causing a global IT outage. Competitors like SentinelOne exploited the chaos, shaking customer trust and eroding CrowdStrike's market value by 25%.
The fallout from CrowdStrike's disastrous software update on July 19 sent shockwaves through the airline industry, with Jetstar bearing the brunt of the chaos. The Department of Transport's Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics (BITRE) revealed that Jetstar’s cancellations skyrocketed from 153 in June to a staggering 299 in July—an outcome directly tied to the widespread IT meltdown triggered by CrowdStrike's bungled update.
The consequences were far-reaching. The airline industry as a whole saw a sharp decline in performance, with only 72.5 percent of flights departing on time—a significant drop from 77.8 percent the previous month. This disruption dragged on-time performance well below the long-term averages, with the rate of cancellations surpassing historical norms.
CrowdStrike's failure was nothing short of catastrophic. The botched update caused "blue screens of death" across Microsoft's Windows systems, cutting off access to critical cloud-based services for countless firms. Airlines, already operating on tight schedules, were particularly hard-hit. Jetstar found its entire operation crippled as boarding, check-in, and baggage handling systems ground to a halt. Flights were cancelled en masse, with the airline unable to resume normal operations until well into the next day.
Adding insult to injury, Jetstar's communication systems also failed, leaving the airline unable to effectively manage the crisis or provide timely updates to passengers. The ripple effects of this outage were felt globally, with travellers stranded, business plans disrupted, and customer trust severely eroded. Despite efforts to restore services, the damage—both operationally and reputationally—had already been done.
In the wake of the global IT outage, CrowdStrike's position as a cybersecurity leader is under direct assault—not just from the technical failure itself, but from the opportunistic manoeuvres of its rivals. The July 19 incident, which crippled millions of computers worldwide, has exposed glaring vulnerabilities in CrowdStrike's software, leading to a dramatic 25 percent drop in the company’s market value.
CrowdStrike’s president, Michael Sentonas, has lashed out at competitors, accusing them of engaging in “shady” tactics to exploit the situation.
"Our industry is built on trust," Sentonas asserted, condemning rival firms for using the crisis to erode CrowdStrike’s customer base. He dismissed their actions as desperate and misguided, stating that no cybersecurity vendor can offer absolute guarantees against such incidents. Yet, the damage to CrowdStrike's reputation is undeniable, with the company now scrambling to regain the trust it once held.
The indirect consequences of the outage are equally damaging. SentinelOne and Trellix, CrowdStrike’s fiercest competitors, have seized the opportunity to undermine CrowdStrike’s credibility. SentinelOne’s CEO, Tomer Weingarten, did not mince words, attributing the global shutdown to "bad design decisions" and a "risky architecture" at CrowdStrike. Trellix’s CEO, Bryan Palma, went a step further, reassuring clients that their more conservative approach would prevent such catastrophic failures, implicitly casting doubt on CrowdStrike’s capabilities.
These attacks have not only shaken customer confidence but have also shifted market dynamics. SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks, buoyed by the fallout, have seen their shares rise by 19 and 13 percent, respectively, as investors bet on their ability to capitalise on CrowdStrike's weakened position. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike’s market standing—once unassailable—has been significantly eroded.
The direct and indirect repercussions of this incident extend beyond financial losses. The IT outage has sparked broader concerns about the robustness of cybersecurity infrastructures globally, highlighting the potential for single points of failure to cause widespread disruption. CrowdStrike’s response—pledging to introduce new checks and staggered updates—may mitigate future risks, but the company’s reliance on deep integration within the operating system’s kernel remains a double-edged sword. While essential for combating sophisticated cyber threats, this approach has proven to be a liability when things go wrong.
CrowdStrike’s ability to navigate this crisis will be critical not only for its future but also for the broader cybersecurity landscape, where trust is both hard-earned and easily lost. The company now faces an uphill battle to restore its reputation, reassure its clients, and fend off competitors eager to seize the moment. The global IT outage may have exposed a chink in CrowdStrike’s armor, but whether it will prove fatal to their market dominance remains to be seen.
OpenAI’s AI pricing jumps to $2000 to $20000 per month after a $5 billion loss. Competing with xAI’s cheaper Grok 3 and China’s autonomous Manus AI, the 2025 AI race now depends on affordability, precision, and autonomy.
Elon Musk’s X AI platform has been hit by a massive cyber-attack, leaving users in the U.S. and UK unable to refresh feeds or access accounts. Musk confirmed the attack’s severity, pointing to IP traces from “the Ukraine area,” though experts caution that origin masking is possible.
Late last week, an extraordinary announcement signaled a dramatic shift in U.S. cybersecurity policy: the Trump administration deprioritized Russia as a leading cyber threat. Experts fear downplaying Moscow’s aggression could expose American networks to new risks and undermine national security.
Since early 2022, the British government has tied Iran to over 20 plots threatening UK citizens, reflecting Tehran’s expanding covert tactics. These attempts—spanning assassination, kidnapping, and surveillance—mark a significant escalation on British soil.
