The recent federal budget has highlighted dependencies and potential vulnerabilities in Australia's approach to cyber security. The decommissioning of four centralised cyber hubs and the reallocation of funding towards new initiatives is causing concern about the continuity of industry-led cyber education programs and the national cyber resilience initiative.
These changes have highlighted the crucial role of government support in promoting cyber security education and resilience. However, they have also revealed the potential pitfalls of over-reliance on such support. The sudden shift in funding has left some questioning the stability of the sector and the future of STEM programs, which are vital for developing the next generation of cyber security professionals.
Australia's cyber security landscape, in the wake of this new federal budget, serves as a reminder of the importance of a balance between public and private sector involvement. There is a growing need for the Australian federal and state governments to not only support industry-led cyber essentials education leadership programs but also to leverage government-led initiatives to build cyber hubs.
A recent report from InnovationAus.com reveals that the federal government's initiative to centralise networks through hubs in Canberra's largest agencies will be decommissioned after an $80 million pilot1. In place of these hubs, a series of new initiatives to harden cyber security are being developed, including the National Office of Cyber Security within Home Affairs. While the ongoing support of agencies currently served by the hubs is assured, the future beyond this is unclear1.
The establishment of the National Office of Cyber Security is a positive step towards enhancing federal government cyber security efforts. However, this move must not come at the expense of private sector involvement. The strength of Australia's cyber security resilience lies in the collaboration between public and private sectors, enabling an exchange of knowledge, resources, and innovation.
The decision to discontinue the cyber hubs also raises questions about the long-term implications for the cyber security industry. Andy Penn, former Telstra chief executive, called for the cyber hubs to have "more teeth and their work needs to be accelerated". With the decommissioning of these hubs, there is an opportunity for the private sector to step in and contribute to the cyber resilience of the nation.
The federal and state governments need to recognise the value of these industry-led initiatives and provide the necessary support. It's crucial that they foster an environment conducive to investment in cyber security education and resilience. By doing so, they can help ensure the continuity of STEM programs and the development of the next generation of cyber security professionals.
The government's role should be to facilitate and encourage these industry-led efforts, offering financial support where necessary, but also creating policies that enable these initiatives to flourish. This balanced approach would help ensure the long-term stability of the sector and the continued growth of Australia's cyber security capabilities.
Recognising the importance of national cyber resilience policy and our digital defensive strategies for the new era, the Australian federal and state governments play an indispensable role. By supporting and capitalising on industry-led cyber essentials education leadership programs, they demonstrate the power of collaboration with the private sector. This cooperative stance allows for the creation of a robust and resilient cyber security landscape, fully equipped to navigate future challenges.
Sources
